12/18/2023 0 Comments Gitkraken vs sourcetree![]() ![]() Being able to do something weird like drop or reorder a single commit without fussing with a rebase, or quickly reword the commit message is just…nice.Ĭlearly I’m still conflicted about this, as such, I’m going to use the easiest one which is Fork for now. I don’t think it’s a good enough trade-off yetĮ.g.Juggling commits is better in Gitkraken.Gitkraken has vastly superior integrations.It’s just not something they’re focussing on at this stage (I have a slightly unusual setup) Conclusion? I did have some issues with Gitkakens one-button oauth solution and submitted a bug. To be fair, Gitkraken isn’t really slow, it’s slower than Fork. Integrations are great, but it doesn’t feel worth juggling PAT’s to make it work. Gitkraken is leaning into some distinguishing features like it’s Terminal, Workspaces, and other integrations which is nice BUT I don’t care as much about that as I do some other things like:įork is massively almost overwhelmingly superior in both of these aspects. The UI differences are there but they’re not significant, and yet I feel like Gitkraken is a bit nicer. That sounds like the correct behaviour, but recently in Fork I ticked “Remove stash after applying” and moved on, but it was remembered the next time which I didn’t want. Perhaps it’s the fact that the defaults and flows mean I get less prompts, and if I set something that ISN’T a default, it’s NOT remembered. It’s defaults fit my workflow quite well, and SOMETHING about it just feels a bit nicer. Reading all the above “facts”, it feels like I’m leaning towards Gitkraken, and to some extent I am. We will use GitKraken to illustrate the Git branch structure from here on. Sometimes it doesn’t matter what the tool does, it’s more about how it feels. If you're on Linux, you may want to try GitKraken. Has a custom terminal with additional git features.Has it’s own Workspaces feature allowing a custom board and whatnot for teams, etc.They both have similar features, although I’d say Gitkrakens is slightly better, better syntax highlighting, better support for entire file view, etc. Inlines branch/tag with commit message, shows SHA and commit timeīranch/tag pulls out to left, hides commit time a little Single button, rebase by default (I think)įails with Git output, needed to tick box in modal Yearly subscription instead of one-off payment.Nice defaults and helpful suggestions (do you want to force push?).Ultimately, the best way to decide which Git client is right for you is to try them both out and see which one you prefer. And if you are concerned about performance, you should choose the lighter-weight client. Specific Git hosting service, you should choose the client that supports that service. If you are looking for a free Git client, Sourcetree is a good option. If you are looking for a modern and visually appealing user interface, GitKraken is a good option. The best choice for you will depend on your individual needs and preferences. ![]() On the other hand, Sourcetree is generally considered to be lightweight applications that can run more efficiently on older machines. Performance: Compared to Sourcetree, GitKraken is recognized for its relatively high resource consumption, which can cause performance issues on older or less capable computers. Sourcetree is owned by Atlassian, the same company that owns Bitbucket, and is optimized for use with Bitbucket and other Atlassian products. Integrating with Git hosting services: Gitkraken offers integration with a wide range of Git hosting services, including GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. ![]() Pricing: Gitkraken is a commercial product which offers a free test period, after which users must purchase a licnese. The preference for either interface may vary among users, with some finding Gitkraken’s interface more appealing, while other may prefer Sourcetree’s interface due to its familiarity and ease of use. User Interface: The user interface of GitKraken is designed with a modern and visually pleasing approach, whereas Sourcetree’s interface follows a more traditional and utilitarian design. However, there are some key differences between the two tools. Exploring Git GUI Tools: Sourcetree, GitKraken, and GitHub Desktop. Gitkraken and Sourcetree are both Git clients that can be used to manage Git repositories, visualize changes, and resolve conflicts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |